The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is unreasonable as it is too unfasible to the extent that the punishment (3 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below is too unfased.

2. Determination is based on the circumstance that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being informed of the fact that he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence on June 17, 2016 due to driving without a license for driving under drinking, and in particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime without being informed of the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the distance of driving is short, and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and behavior, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, are considered, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor’s appeal of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that the two acts of the judgment of the court below are a clerical error in the Road Traffic Act among the application of the two Acts and subordinate statutes of the court below, it is obvious that it is a clerical error in the Road Traffic Act