The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. The defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been punished several times for traffic crimes, such as drinking, driving, etc., and is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant is against the obligation of the Defendant, his father was driving without a license in order to take him into account in the general hospital, and there exist grounds for some consideration in the circumstances, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, etc., such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed as unfair as it

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor’s appeal to the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that the part on “the above” of two sides of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error of “D highest typ,” and thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25 of the