logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.15 2020가단5094450
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is a special corporation that implements industrial accident compensation insurance projects entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

The non-party B (son and C) is a daily worker who belongs to G, a glass construction subcontractor, at the site of “F building construction works” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, where Non-party D Company performed, and was injured due to the following traffic accidents.

The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle quantity for H-faccup (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

B. (A) On April 15, 2017, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, driving the Defendant vehicle, driving on the front side of the “F Building Construction Work” located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant accident site”) at approximately 13.7km/h speed depending on the reception of the On-Site Control Board at the construction site of the said new construction site, while the victim, who was on the front side of the Defendant vehicle, returned his own body and entered the direction of the Defendant vehicle into the direction of the Defendant vehicle, she shocked the victim with the front front wheels and front side fences of the right side of the Defendant vehicle, and caused the victim to suffer injuries, such as “the victim, who was at the right right side side of the Defendant vehicle and the rear side of the right side of the Defendant vehicle, the right side slick, the right side slick fever, the slurkletletletlet, the humletletletletlet, the humleted sp, and so on.”

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The victim was hospitalized in relation to the Sheshed diagnosis sentence during the period from April 15, 2017 to July 5, 2018, and received hospital treatment. After the completion of the treatment, he/she left the permanent disability of physical restriction (within the scope of movement to 0-125 degrees, normal 150 degrees) on the right chain on the right chain.

(In the case of Mabrid disability assessment table, such disability status shall fall under Section II-3 of the slives and fall under the loss of 10 per cent of the working ability based on outdoor workers.

The accident of this case.

arrow