The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving BOba.

On 19:40 on 24, 2016, the Defendant driven the above Oral Ba, and passed through the intersection where traffic is not controlled by the Defendant, driving at a low speed, driving at the 19:40 on the 19:0 on the 19:0 on the 19:0, the two roads in the north-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, for the two directions of the canal-gra, toward the second direction of the

At this point, the width of the intersection road is wide.

In such cases, if the width of the intersection is larger than that of the road on which a driver is driving, it shall be slowly done, and if there is another vehicle seeking to enter the intersection from a road with a wide width, the vehicle has a duty of care to yield the course to the vehicle and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeds as it is, and the right side of the victim's E-learning vehicle proceeding to the intersection from the left side of the defendant's proceeding direction was shocked by the front side of the victim's E-learning vehicle.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim F by occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Determination

A. On January 23, 2017, public prosecutor’s revocation of public prosecution regarding the instant case

(b) A decision to dismiss a public prosecution (Article 328 (1) 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act);