logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.11.30 2012고단2867
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who drives DM5 car, Defendant B is a driver of E 25 passenger bus.

Defendant

A, around 13:50 on 25. 25. 2012, driving the said car, and directed the road in front of the Gosung dong, which is in front of the window of Changwon city, toward the non-fluoral speed in the direction of the selling post office in the direction of the gas station for sale. Defendant B driven the said bus and directed about about 50 km in the direction of the nuclear station in the extreme apartment.

At the same time, the driver of a motor vehicle who intends to enter an intersection where traffic is not controlled, in a case where the width of the intersection is wider than that of the road where the motor vehicle is traveling, the driver of the motor vehicle who intends to drive the intersection where the traffic is not controlled, shall yield the course to the motor vehicle in a case where there is such a motor vehicle, and the driver of the motor vehicle driving the intersection has the duty of care to prevent the accident of other motor vehicles driving the intersection through the intersection by taking into account well the right and the right and the right of the road where the traffic is not controlled.

Nevertheless, Defendant A’s house entered the intersection from the side of the road to the intersection and the width of the intersection is larger than that of the road on which he passes, so it is necessary to consider whether Defendant A is a vehicle seeking to enter the intersection with a wide width. However, due to negligence, Defendant A’s failure to look at whether he is a vehicle seeking to drive the intersection on the road in which the width is wider than that of the road on which he passes. However, Defendant B conflicts with the former part of the bus left ahead of the bus operated by Defendant B as a part of the lower part on the right edge of the above SM5 vehicle. Defendant B neglected his duty of moving the intersection into the intersection in the direction of the road to the original direction from the right edge of the road to the right edge apartment, and caused negligence to go through the front part of the above bus in front of

arrow