Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 10, 2014, at around 01:05, the Defendant: (a) opened the house of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 6 Dong 1005, and was faced with a disturbance, such as admitting the house at one’s own house; (b) opened the first race in front of the house; (c) opened the door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties on the maintenance of order, instead of F, G’s public security, and maintenance of order.

In addition, as the victim H (the age of 27) who is a police officer belonging to the E District Group called F and G, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim on the following grounds: “I am feasia, feasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasia, fasia.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The protocol of each police statement concerning D, F, H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (with respect to the obstruction of performance of official duties)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not likely to obstruct the performance of official duties by the defendant by assaulting two police officers without justifiable grounds, and to insult the police officers by taking a bath.

However, the defendant does not have any criminal records of the same kind of crime or of the suspension of execution, in addition to one time before and after a fine is imposed on the defendant, and the defendant seems to have committed any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, and again commits the same crime as in this case.