1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a credit cooperative established under the Community Credit Cooperatives Act, and the plaintiff was the defendant's chief director from March 12, 2008.

B. From March 6, 2018 to March 14, 2018, the Daegu Regional Headquarters of the Saemaul Savings Depository (hereinafter “instant inspection”) conducted an inspection against the Defendant (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

C. The inspection team employees discovered the irregularities regarding the creation and use of the Defendant executives, including the Plaintiff, during the inspection process of the instant case.

C. On March 8, 2018, at the chief director office of the first floor of the defendant's main office, the plaintiff held the responsibility for the above misconduct, and the plaintiff voluntarily prepared and signed a letter of resignation that the plaintiff would resign from the defendant's chief director office (hereinafter referred to as "the resignation of this case") and submitted it to the employees of the above inspection team.

On the same day, the plaintiff also prepared a budget improper confirmation letter that recognizes improper use of the funds.

C as the second floor of the defendant's office on the same day, he prepared a letter of resignation with the content that the plaintiff would resign from the office of chief director as the defendant's vice chief director was found and requested to confirm the letter of resignation of this case. E confirmed the above letter of resignation and signed it.

From the first floor of the above main office of the defendant, F, who is the regular director of the defendant, entered the date and number of receipt in the above main office and entered the matters concerning the receipt of the resignation in the document reception ledger.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 9, Eul evidence 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. Plaintiff (1) The resignation of this case is not the Plaintiff’s truth-finding prepared by the pressure, pressure, and revolving of the prosecutor’s team. Since the prosecutor’s team led the Plaintiff to a disciplinary action and criminal charge against its employees, the resignation of this case was null and void. ② The Plaintiff’s resignation of this case to the prosecutor’s team.