The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant came to know of the fact that the victim was hospitalized with her hurgical pain while she was working for a long time at the convenience store where the victim had been working, and it was merely a contact in the process of taking clothes through which the victim was able to get off from her hurging in mind while she tried to transport the goods supplied by the victim who was working at the convenience store.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the

2. The Defendant also asserted the same as the grounds for appeal in this part of the judgment below, and the court below rejected the above assertion in detail, stating the Defendant’s argument and its decision in the judgment.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning closely compared with the evidence duly admitted and examined, the judgment of the court below is reasonable and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misapprehending the legal principles.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

(On the other hand, although the defendant stated in the statement of grounds for appeal that he/she is dissatisfied with the sentencing, the court did not separately judge since it asserted only mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as grounds for

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.