1. The plaintiff's incidental appeal and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport.

1. Presumed factual basis

A. The Plaintiff is a police officer (police officer) under the Gangwon-do Local Police Agency.

B. On June 23, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as an offense of insult.

(Chuncheon District Court 2017 High Court 2017 High Court 1712). Criminal facts of the above case are as follows:

On May 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:54, on the street in front of Chuncheon City, and reported to the 1112 report related to the drinking value, and sent out, and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was a police official belonging to the Chuncheon Police Station E zone E zone, the Plaintiff, F, G, and H, who was a police official belonging to the Chuncheon Police Station E zone, and did not hear the drinking value and returned home to the Defendant, and (c) on the ground that the Defendant’s three players, such as I, protect the three players, such as I, “I, f, G, and H, who have received the drinking value, f, and I, do so. I must do so more than I am, and you must do so. I am the bit of bit of bitch, which would have to receive the drinking value from the Defendant, and we must live with our public official, due to the bad fright, bad fel’s fright, and we will to live.”

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant insulting act.” Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims.

[Judgment of the court below] The ground for recognition is without merit, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the ground for appeal

2. The nature of the claim for damages based on the tort liability

A. The Defendant alleged that the Defendant was punished for the insult of the instant case, but did not err with the Plaintiff.

Since the Plaintiff suffered mental pain due to the insult of this case, the Plaintiff sought compensation for consolation money of KRW 3,000,000 and damages for delay based on tort liability against the Defendant.

B. According to the above facts, according to the above facts, the defendant committed the insult of this case against the plaintiff (the defendant is not against the plaintiff, but against the plaintiff). However, the defendant is at the first instance court.