beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
The reasoning of the judgment of this court cited in the judgment of the first instance is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows. The judgment of this court concerning the assertion that the plaintiff and the defendant stressed or added each other in the trial of the first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the judgment as set forth in paragraph (2) below. Thus, it is cited including summary language
Part 8 through 9 "2011Kadan1718" shall be applied to "2014Kadan1718".
No. 8 No. 12 shall be referred to as "No. 5".
Each 14th and 13th and 10th and each 10th and each 14th and each 10th and each 10th and each 10th and each 10th and each 10th and each 10th king.
Part 12, " December 27, 2013" in Part 10 shall be applied to " December 26, 2013".
Part 11 "(Article 554 of the Civil Act)" shall be amended to "(Article 544 of the Civil Act)".
The phrase “500 admission” is not “500 admission,” but “2500 admission,” which is the summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion.
The Defendant paid KRW 5,00,000,000 among KRW 25,00,000 paid on December 26, 2013 to 10,000 as a mutual savings deposit, and the Defendant paid KRW 20,000,00 for 15,00 as a mutual savings deposit, was agreed between the Defendant and the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the Defendant’s argument that KRW 5,000,000 is a part of KRW 25,000,000, which the Defendant remitted to the Plaintiff on December 26, 2013, which was already deducted from KRW 15,000 that the Plaintiff would receive. Therefore, the Defendant’s argument that KRW 5,00,000 should be deducted from KRW 39,00,000, is without merit, and the Defendant should pay KRW 5,000 to the Plaintiff additionally.
With respect to the summary of the Defendant’s assertion 15th century, the issue of whether the Plaintiff paid the amount at 43 and 44 times as of the date of receipt of the said amount shall bear the burden of proving that the Plaintiff was liable to pay the amount.
In addition, 7,500,000 won paid to the Plaintiff’s son F, as part of the fraternity paid No. 45, must be deducted from the unpaid fraternity.
(1) No. 46 shall be charged.