Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A served as the chairperson of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents of Apartment Houses from July 2009 to November 31, 2012, and Defendant B served as the chairperson of the said apartment house security ledger from March 2008 to October 31, 2012.

Defendants were the Dong-won, E, and managing director of the above apartment complex that Defendant A had a dispute in connection with the selection, etc. of housing controlled entities.

F. The auditor who was the representative meeting of occupants

With respect to the case in which a complaint was filed against G as a crime of defamation, D et al. submitted to the court the work site for the security ledger by asserting that D et al. had not been posted a false content, and D et al. changed the work site.

Appellants and motions to file their complaints.

Defendants around March 20, 2015, at the house of Defendant A of the above apartment H heading, at around March 20, 2015, were the Dong representative of the above apartment unit D, E, and management complaint.

F. The auditor who was the representative meeting of occupants

G For the purpose of being subject to criminal punishment, “D, F, G, and E shall act in collusion with each other on December 16, 2014, and attach “(m) 50 startings” to the column of the occurrence of the work site for the Voluntary Security Book prepared by B on September 29, 2012, and in the same way as “(m) not commencing a public notice board” to the same page. Instead, it shall be reproduced by means of inserting it into the same page as “not commencing a public notice board..........” The part of the instant part of the instant part of the instant part, which was filled in a knife and damaged, would not start the public notice board, and would be removed, and the said part of the said part would be deleted, and the case was committed by submitting it to the court and submitting it to the same effect as the forgery and use of the private document.

A thorough investigation shall be conducted and severe punishment shall be made and the main time shall be observed.

Recognizing an accusation, “assumed” was drawn up.

However, in fact, Defendant B, not D, F, G, and E, whose work on the above guard ledger, entered the contents thereof, and Defendant B, as to the defamation case on December 16, 2014 (Seoul Southern District Court).