logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단1490
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was issued by the Seoul Central District Court on February 29, 2008 a summary order of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on October 4, 2013, a summary order of 4 million won was issued by the Seoul East East District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Dobs car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from a dangerous driving) and the Road Traffic Act (dbening driving).

On February 17, 2018, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.126% on the front side of Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and driven the said vehicle along three-lanes between the 4-lanes from the offside of the network source to the remote distance from the opposite side of the Seongdong-do.

At the time, there was a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive in the front direction in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and failed to accurately operate the brake system, led the Defendant to a signal at the front direction of the Defendant’s driving, and was driven by the victim F(50) of the Victim F.(50) who was under the stop, the lower part of the Gstststy cab was driven by the Defendant as the front part of the car of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant driving a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

B. The Defendant also got involved in driving the said car at the time and place set forth in Section 1-A, and at the same time and place set forth in the above paragraph, and was seated on the top of the car operation in which the accident occurred.

B At the request of the purport that “N's driving is changed”, this is called “N's driving.”

arrow