Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 14,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On November 24, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) at the Suwon Flag Flag.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a person engaged in operating QM6 automobiles.

On June 30, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.104 percent in blood around 23:07, while driving it in the influence of alcohol, and driven the two-lanes of the shooting distance range in front of the Dr. D located in the Gansi Metropolitan Area C in Gansi-si. The Defendant driven the two-lanes from the area of powder to the uneasible level.

At the time, there were night vehicles, waiting in the front direction of the defendant's proceeding and stopping vehicles.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the driver of the motor vehicle, operating the steering gear and brakes accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop at the front time while waiting at the front time, waiting for the signal at the direction of the Defendant’s driving, waiting for the back end of the victim E (the 42-year-old driver) driving, waiting for the signal at the front time of the Defendant’s driving, and accordingly, the above A6 passenger vehicle was pushed ahead of the Defendant’s driving and waiting for the front time while pushing for the instant A6 passenger vehicle in the future and waiting for the signal at the front time, and the rear end of the H passenger vehicle of the victim G (the 52-year-old driver) driving while waiting for the above A6 passenger vehicle. The above Poter-II cargo, waiting for the front time and waiting for the signal at the front time while driving the 58-year-old cargo in the future, led the victim I (the 58-year-old driver) who was waiting for the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim E by occupational negligence during approximately three weeks of crypitis, and the injury to crypines, tensions and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim G, and the crypines that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim I.