Text
1. The Defendant: 75,060,038 won to Plaintiff A; 8,374,700 won to Plaintiff C; 5,000,000 won to Plaintiff D; and 1,000 won to Plaintiff E.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is the party-related 1) G general industrial complex formation work at the Flunwon in Busan-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter "the instant construction work").
2) The Plaintiff is an implementer who implemented the project at the construction site. The Plaintiff is a person who felled in the car accident, and the Plaintiff C is the father of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s mother, and the Plaintiff E’s partner.
B. (1) On December 23, 2012, Plaintiff A is the H SP car owned by Plaintiff C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) around December 17, 2012.
2) The road end point (hereinafter “the instant accident point”) in the course of operating the road, which entered a two-lanes from the construction site of this case, in order to find a socially located near the construction site of this case.
For about 6m and 80m (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).
2) The Plaintiff A suffered from the injury of a closed liverion, etc. due to the instant accident.
3. The end of the road at the site of the instant accident is about 6m 80m high compared to the neighboring land. At the time of the instant accident, the instant accident location did not have a drums or protective walls, etc. to prevent fall, and did not have any warning signs, etc. to inform the risk of fall. At the entrance of the instant construction site, no facilities or signs, etc. to prevent entry into the instant construction site were installed.
C. As a result of the relevant criminal procedure, the Defendant’s employee I, who was the person in charge of management at the construction site of this case, has an occupational duty to take safety measures, such as marking back a backer or blocking vehicles, etc. from entering the construction site of this case, and installing a protective railer, etc. so as not to fall into a neighboring site even if the vehicles, etc. enter the construction site of this case, leaving the site alone without taking such measures, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff.