logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2016.10.12 2015가단1495
배당이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff filed a payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) ordering payment of KRW 1 billion in loan amount against the Gangwon-do residents’ professional axis group (hereinafter “the instant axis group”). The Plaintiff received a payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) with the Gangwon-do Government District Court Decision 2013Guj196, and issued a seizure and collection order (hereinafter “the instant collection order”) with the title of execution with regard to the claim for the refund of deposit against Q and R, etc. of the instant axis group as the title of execution with regard to the claim for the refund of deposit against Q and R, etc. of the instant axis group.

The distribution procedure of Q and R et al. (hereinafter “instant distribution procedure”) was conducted with deposit of KRW 130,00,000,071,776 won (the amount of dividends to the selected Defendants was KRW A7,918,070, KRW 6494,106, KRW C1,623,526, KRW D1,082,350, KRW 442,780, KRW F10, KRW 11,023,00, KRW 510, KRW 11,020, KRW 157, KRW 747, KRW 74747, KRW 747, KRW 457, KRW 485, KRW 485, KRW 485, KRW 450, KRW 4750, KRW 475, KRW 5305, KRW 485, KRW 5305, KRW 485, KRW 5315, Defendant, 45315305, Defendant 485,

Although the Defendants are false wage creditors, they should be excluded from the distribution procedure of the instant case, the instant distribution schedule with the contents of preferential distribution to the Defendants should be corrected to distribute all the dividend amounts of the Defendants to the Plaintiff.

However, in case where the designated parties received dividends in the enforcement procedure, it is unclear whether the designated parties to the lawsuit of demurrer against distribution are the designated parties, and whether the designated parties are the designated parties, and thus, they seek rectification of the instant distribution schedule against Defendant A or the Defendants.

2. The plaintiff's claim for judgment of this case according to the collection order of this case.

arrow