1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is the driver of D vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 10:30 on August 1, 2017, the Defendant’s vehicle was running in the direction of collapse at the intersection located in the Chyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and did not proceed to the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right

C. By September 26, 2017, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 12,430,000 at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 3, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The main point of the party’s assertion is that the driver of the Defendant vehicle, who was not familiar with the Plaintiff vehicle after the Plaintiff’s completion of the left-hand turn, conflicts with the Plaintiff vehicle, and thus, the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant vehicle was responsible for the full-time negligence on the part of the driver, and sought KRW 10,600,000 as the repair cost of the Plaintiff vehicle.

이에 대하여 피고는, 원고차량은 피고차량의 운전자가 초행길로 일시적으로 진로를 잘못 잡아 잠시 멈칫거리는 상황을 발견하고도 교차로의 중심 안쪽을 이용하여 좌회전하지 않고 교차로 중심 바깥쪽을 이용하여 빠른 속도로 좌회전하다가 이 사건 사고가 발생한 것이며, 피고차량이 중앙선을 침범한 사실은 없으므로, 원고차량 운전자에게 전적인 과실이 있다고 주장하며, 이 사건 사고로 인한 피고차량의 수리비 합계 2,847,380원을 반소로 구한다.

B. Determination