A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 11:40 on July 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (b) expressed the victim’s desire to restrain the victim by “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

2. On the date stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the time stated in paragraph 1, interfered with the victim’s bath business for about 30 minutes by force, such as “the person who has come to her house and her house shall be raised. This she shall be her part; hereinafter this she shall be her part, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., taking a bath for customers who are taking a bath at the same time, and causing them to be on the job.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear F phone statements for reference);

1. Relevant Articles 260(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;