beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014, 460"
1. On March 17, 2013, from around 21:01 to 21:13, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in Ansan-si B, and Da (the age of 52) working in the said place, and the Defendant was out of the soup lab, so that he was out of the soup laba, and she was out of his will to ignore himself as the day he did a dispute.
Accordingly, D is prohibited from drinking alcohol, allowing them to enter a bath, and demanding a bath, and thus, it interfered with D and its management work by force, without leaving the place of “I have drinking. N. L. s. s. s. s.)” and “D and its customers who have access to the place.”
2. On March 17, 2013, from around 21:43 to 21:56 of the same day, the Defendant re-exploded and sound, and d, for the same reasons as the preceding one, at the entrance of the Crata and the Crata and the Cratter in Ansan-si B, and obstructed the Defendant’s business of shooting and management by force by avoiding disturbance, such as gathering the Defendant’s animal and Dorat on the front floor of the Crata.
"2014, 461"
1. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant interfered with his/her business, at around 20:35 on the roads front of the Ansung Agricultural Cooperative's stone stop store located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.
The bus could not proceed for about 10 minutes by avoiding disturbances, such as blocking the F-F-cup passenger bus front of the city bus driven by the victim E, who is waiting for the signal on the above-road road.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's urban bus driving service by force.
2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time, at the place, and at the same time and place as indicated in the above Paragraph (1) above, walked in front of the F urban bus in front of the traffic signal at a bend, and damaged the above urban bus, which is owned by the victim, by putting the window of the above urban bus in both hands, thereby damaging the repair cost of 103,000 won.
Summary of Evidence
[2014 High Court Decision 460]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;
1. CCTV images (2014 high-scale 461);
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. E.