logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.11.01 2019누45465
융자상환금조정신청거부처분무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance is not significantly different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance. However, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion is reviewed together with the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial of the first instance, it is justifiable to determine that the instant notification does not constitute a disposition subject to appeal litigation.

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed on the ground that the judgment of the court of the first instance is just as it is concluded. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow