logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.02.07 2019누48778
중앙토지수용위원회감정평가금액 인정 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The judgment of the court of first instance that the Plaintiff’s assertion in the court of first instance is not significantly different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the court of first instance, and even after examining the Plaintiff’s assertion together with the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance, it does not directly affect the rights and obligations of the public as an act of legal enforcement with regard to specific facts conducted by an administrative agency as the subject of public authority, that is, an appraisal for the approval of the management and disposition plan for the

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed as unlawful, and the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow