logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.05 2015고단7885
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around October 29, 2015, the Defendant “ 2015 Highest 7885” connects the Internet NAVVV to the Internet Handphones around October 29, 2015 with a Handphone from the French-dong Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “Sol-gu 3rd 5th Embs”).

After posting a letter "," the victim C who reported and contacted this, the victim C made a false statement as if he/she sold the above tamp.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the above diskettes and did not have the intention or ability to sell the above diskettes to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred KRW 100,000 to the bank account (number : E) in the name of the Defendant’s female-friendly family account under the name of the Defendant.

In addition, the Defendant received the remittance of KRW 2,893,50 in total on 27 occasions from October 4, 2015 to November 29, 2015 by the same method as indicated in attached Table 1.

around July 26, 2015, the Defendant sent a Kakao Stockholm message to the victim on July 26, 2015, by linking the Internet NAVV with Handphones from the French-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul to the Internet (hereinafter referred to as the “Stok Stok scoo scoos”).

The above kickboard was sold falsely as if it were sold.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the above kick, and did not have the intention or ability to sell it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 140,000 won from the victim to the new bank account (number : G) in the name of the Defendant.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of 413,000 won from July 26, 2015 to October 26, 2015 by means of the same method as indicated in attached Table 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or H;

1. I’s petition; and

arrow