logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2016.03.31 2015고단238
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Dsch Rexton car.

On August 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:20, and led to the flow of the three-lane road located at a point 234.4 km on the Gi-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-do, Chungcheongnam-do-ri-do, Chungcheongnam-do-ri-do, to the Daejeon (Seoul-do-ri-do-ri-si) Myeon.

Since there is a road where the passage of a vehicle is frequent, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking well the right and the right of the front.

However, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while neglecting his duty at the front time, and neglected to do so, the Defendant received the central separation stand in front of the Defendant’s driver’s driver’s car in front of it, and caused the central separation to be set in the opposite lane.

After all, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, escaped without taking necessary measures, without destroying the central separation unit owned by the victim Korean Road Corporation to repair the repair cost of KRW 600,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Field map, actual condition survey report, and on-site photographs of a traffic accident;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Evidence List 26);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was the vehicle driven by the Defendant, resulting in a traffic hazard not only in the proceeding but also in the opposite side of the vehicle with the centralized separation cost fasted.

B. The risk of traffic accidents has occurred, such as collision between the central separation of the bus damaged on the opposite side and the bus with passengers.

As such, the Defendant left the scene without taking necessary measures, causing serious traffic risks and obstacles, and the nature of the offense is heavy.

b)in addition,

arrow