1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation as to the instant case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the following judgments as to the allegations emphasized or added by the plaintiffs, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiffs asserts that there was no food prior to the death of the deceased, and that even if they were to drink a shot, it cannot be deemed that it did not cause the death of the deceased.

However, according to the fact-finding results on Eul evidence No. 1-2 and J Hospital Head of the court of first instance, it is recognized that the deceased stated on November 7, 2015 that he/she received several sensiums on the preceding day at the hospital on which he/she stated that he/she had received several sensiums on the preceding day. The deceased's physician to appraise the medical record at the hospital after performing the surgery as the deceased is at risk of drinking in the event of a funeral, and in the case of the closure of the hospital, there is a risk that the storage of the funeral content may occur, and this may result in an excessive increase of spas, and it is recognized that he/she presented his/her opinion that it may cause the collapse of the funeral

According to this, the deceased was suffering from the preceding day of death, and such an act is considered to have been one of the causes of death of the deceased.

The above assertion by the plaintiffs is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiffs' appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as there is no ground.