1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiffs for each amount indicated in the separate sheet of compensation.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name - Business name: M development project (hereinafter “instant project”): The Defendants - Notice: N on October 15, 2010; N on November 30, 2012; N on November 30, 2012; P on June 7, 2013

(b) Decision on expropriation made on November 26, 2013 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal - The date of commencement of expropriation: January 25, 2014 - Persons subject to expropriation: The same shall apply to the list of the details of the compensation in attached Form.

(hereinafter referred to as “land subject to expropriation of this case”) - Compensation: The amount shall be calculated as the same as the indicated in the “land subject to expropriation” column in attached Form 3, which derives from the arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of appraisal by appraisal corporations and by appraisal corporations, one stock company

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 26, 2015 - Compensation: Determination of the same amount as indicated in the column of “interestd amount” in the attached Form of compensation details, which is obtained by taking an arithmetic mean of each appraisal result of the appraisal corporation of the corporation, the corporation and the corporation flood appraisal corporation.

(d) The result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal - Compensation: The phrase “court appraisal amount” in the attached Form No. 1 shall be indicated.

- Experts: Facts without any dispute over Q (which is the basis for recognition) (the corporation’s first appraisal corporation; hereinafter “court appraiser”), Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (which include the number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the appraisal entrustment by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The main point of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the compensation for the land subject to expropriation of this case reflects the wrong appraisal result, such as not reflecting the transaction examples and the compensation preference of neighboring similar land, and it is remarkably lower than the market price.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiffs the difference between the reasonable compensation for the land subject to expropriation of this case and the compensation and the compensation for delay as stipulated in the instant adjudication.

3. Determination

(a)in the case of an increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation;