beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) KRW 41,265,093 and KRW 16,920,453 among them shall be from July 9, 2013; KRW 24,344,640.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 6, Gap evidence 7, Gap evidence 8, Gap evidence 10, Gap evidence 11, Gap evidence 14, and Gap evidence 17.
Since January 2011, C, the Plaintiff’s birth, borrowed money from the Defendant’s husband D several times, the Plaintiff agreed to additionally borrow KRW 20,000,000 from D around November 201, and thereafter requested the Plaintiff to guarantee the Plaintiff’s obligation to borrow money.
B. On December 2, 2011, the Plaintiff issued C and D’s certificate of personal seal impression and certificate of personal seal impression. D agreed to grant C interest of KRW 25,00,000 on the same page with 10% per week, and paid C the Plaintiff’s seal on the side of the issuer’s column of the promissory note in which the Plaintiff’s seal is affixed (hereinafter “the Promissory note in which the Plaintiff’s seal is affixed”) and C deducting KRW 22,50,000,000, which is 10% of the leased interest amount (=25,000,000,000 - 2,50,500,500,000).
[D] KRW 20,000,000, out of the above money, was transferred to the E-(F) financial institution account designated by C, and the remaining KRW 2,500,000 was transferred to the account of C’s financial institution.
C At the request of D on December 13, 2011, D: “C borrowed KRW 90,00,000 from D; D at the time, the debt of C for the loan to D reaches a total of KRW 90,00,000,00 including the loan borrowed on December 2, 2011; and C demanded the preparation of a certificate of loan equivalent to the above amount. The proviso provides that “If the above amount is not repaid, D shall be liable for 150,000,000 won guaranteed by the Plaintiff as well as for the disposition of seizure at the same time” (hereinafter referred to as “certificate of loan”). D.
After December 26, 2011, the defendant issued this case along with D.