Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 18, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving approximately 3 km from the parking lot of the Incheon Sung Hospital located in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to about 571, the same Gu-ro 571, the Gu-ro 571.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is the owner of B Poter 2 freight.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, around November 18, 2016, the Defendant operated the cargo vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 3 km section from the parking lot of the Incheon Sung-dong, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to the shooting distance at approximately 571, e.g., the Dong-gu, Incheon, to the entrance of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on detection, details of control, ledger of driver's license, and inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and reporting on the result of confirmation before and after the disposition;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are examined, and the fact that the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts of this case and reflects his mistake is recognized as favorable to the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case, which the defendant operated a vehicle without mandatory insurance even though the driver's license was revoked, has been subject to punishment several times due to the same type of crimes in light of the contents and methods of the crime.