Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants collected money from the victim D under the pretext that they would be employed as the U.S. environmental source in Magpopo-si.

around 15:00 on December 2, 2015, the Defendants met the victim in the course distribution of the church, and Defendant B introduced Defendant A to the victim, “I may have the victim be employed as a member of the Mapo-si environment U.S. dollars through A on the face of 15 million won,” and Defendant A made a false statement to the victim that “I see to Cheongpo-si in the face of Mapo-si.”

However, even if the defendant A received money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to have the injured party employed as the environmental U.S. source.

around December 3, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 15 million from the Defendant’s wife’s agricultural bank account with KRW 15 million, and KRW 1 million from the NA’s agricultural bank account around December 25, 2015, respectively, on the pretext of the Defendant’s solicitation for employment. Defendant B independently demanded the victim to pay money for expenses incurred in soliciting employment and received KRW 1 million from the damaged person to the NA’s agricultural bank account around February 3, 2016.

As a result, the Defendants received KRW 16 million under the pretext of solicitation for the employment of the environmental source to be handled by the public officials in collusion, and at the same time, Defendant A received money by deceiving the victim, and Defendant B received additional KRW 1 million under the pretext of solicitation for the employment of the environmental source to be handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. The loan certificate, deposit certificate, etc. and the Kakao Stockholm;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 111(1), 30 (A) of the Act; and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (a)

B. Defendant B: Articles 111(1) and 30 of the Act

1. Commercial concurrence;