Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around May 2012, the Defendant received an amount equivalent to KRW 19.7 million in total from F from F to Jun. 2014, 2014, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from the E branch office in Seocho-gu Seoul, to F, the actual representative of the E branch office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of “the relationship between the director of the National Agricultural Cooperative and the director of the National Agricultural Cooperative, which may be possible to enter into an appraisal and assessment agreement with the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation in E,” and received KRW 20,000 from F to Jun. 2014.
As a result, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting business affairs handled by a person deemed a public official pursuant to Article 4(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Legal statement of witness F;
1. Investigation report (written agreement between the Nonghyup Federation and E on the business);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (verification of Account Details of Defendant);
1. Article 111(1) and (2) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 4(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, applicable to the crime;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;
1. Determination on the application of sentencing guidelines under Article 116 of the Act by an attorney-at-law in charge of additional collection: The scope of recommending sentencing guidelines for the reasons of sentencing under Article 116 of the Act: Taking into account all the circumstances, such as the fact that the O defendant has old age in 2013 and received cambac operations in 2013, and returned 20 million won to the National Federation of Nonghyup;