logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단3838
폭행등
Text

1. The indictment against Defendant A is dismissed.

The obstruction of performance of official duties and injury shall be acquitted.2. Defendant B.

Reasons

[2] On September 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported at “E” restaurant located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul on September 29, 2017; and (b) received a report from the victim G, H, and I, who was dispatched by the Defendant, and was asked to produce identification cards from the police officer G, H, and I, and two customers of the restaurant; and (c) received a request for presentation of identification cards from the victims of “I am, I am, L, L, L, and L, in light of the principle of non-taxation and special taxation within the identification card; and (d) in light of the principle of non-taxation and non-taxation in the form of a son’s identification card, son, son who is not fright, fright fright fright fright fright fright, fright fright fright fright, fright fright fright fright fright, fright fright fright f f f f.

C. The term “I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of J’s oral statement;

1. Each penal provision Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 40 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Optional fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “Defendant A”) to attract a workhouse;

1. On September 29, 2017, around 22:55, the Defendant: (a) requested “E” restaurant located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to put the victim J (n, 47 years of age) of a restaurant business operator to a stop on the table; (b) but, upon refusal, assaulted the victim’s face by receiving three times his head.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and was injured at the same place in around 23:02 on the same day, and the Defendant received 112 reports from the victim G (34 tax) who was the police officer of the Seoul Mine Police Station F District, the police officer of the Seoul Mine Police Station, to check the contents of the report from this J, and received the victim’s face one time due to the defect head to arrest the Defendant as an flagrant offender, and suffered injury, such as catum dump, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the 112 report processing by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim.

On January 24, 2018, the part of the dismissal of prosecution shall be the assault on the part of the indictment.

arrow