Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Defendant A of the facts charged from February 2009 to the same year

6. From June 3, 2009 to November 18, 2010, a person who served as the president of the J (Seoul Metropolitan Government I Building) located in Daejeon P (Seoul Metropolitan Government before March 2013) established for the purpose of developing G technology, informatization, and support for the elimination of arrest accidents, etc. from December 3, 2010 to October 22, 2013.

Defendant

B as the representative director of K (ju) established for the purpose of software development, system maintenance, etc., he became aware of the defendant who had worked as E at the time of the maintenance, repair, etc. of the system in E around 199.

Defendant

On December 3, 2010, A, a quasi-governmental institution, was appointed as the president of the J, and around the time of his appointment, A had the desire to complete the instant development project in line with the J-affiliated 10 cycle on January 17, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “instant development project”). However, on December 3, 2010, A had the desire to complete the project in line with the J-affiliated 10 cycles.

As a result, Defendant A constituted a TF Team for the promotion of the instant development project on the early February 201, and around that time, Defendant B participated in the bidding for the selection of the instant development project entity conducted by the Public Procurement Service on April 201, to the effect that Defendant B may be selected as the instant development project entity, such as “a business entity that engaged in M will not be favorable to the selection of the instant development project entity,” and Defendant B participated in the bidding for the selection of the M development entity conducted by the Public Procurement Service on or around February 2011, and the said K completed M by forming a compliance consulting company and a consortium, and completed M by September 201, 201, according to Defendant A’s proposal, the project was first promoted to complete the instant development project in excess of KRW 957 million in total project cost, according to Defendant A’s proposal.

On the other hand, the J's selection of a business operator is ① public notice of the project supervised by the Public Procurement Service, ② receipt of the tender of the service company.