A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around April 2002, the Defendant joined E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) as its executive officers, and took charge of the business of receiving orders from E to December 2012, 201, and was in charge of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) from January 2013 to December 2013.

On August 2010, the Defendant, who was ordered by the Ministry of National Defense, with the president H and the head of the E Technical Project Headquarters I, and other consortiums in charge of the E and other consortiums, intended to receive a high evaluation score from the evaluation committee members of the project plan so that they can receive the consortiums including E (hereinafter referred to as “E consortiums”), and that they will receive a high evaluation score in contact with the selected members on January 201, by paying money and valuables.

On January 201, the Defendant issued a request to the professorJ of Maan University selected as an evaluation member in the field of landscaping planning in relation to the E-Sacheon University business to the effect that “as a result of the evaluation of the field of landscaping planning, changing a good score to E-Sacium,” and issued a request to the J to the effect that “as a result of the evaluation of the field of landscaping planning, KRW 5 million in cash will be drawn up, and the Defendant’s car near the house located in the Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon, Daejeon-gu, to the effect that “as a result of allowing us to carry out the business of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.” The Defendant sent KRW 15 million in cash to the J.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with H and I, provided a bribe of KRW 20 million in total in relation to the duties of the J in relation to the deliberation of the evaluation of landscaping planning for the selection of a person with priority in the business of this thousand official business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination of suspect of I by the prosecution (2 times, 3 times);

1. The interrogation protocol of the Prosecutor’s Office against J (A).