Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the party is a company that supplies chemical slurry used in semiconductor industry (hereinafter referred to as "CMP"), and the defendant is also a company that produces and sells Phoerist related electronic materials business and basic materials for industrial purposes, such as semiconductors, TFTI-L CDs, and PDP, while engaging in slurry business.
(b) The CMF process in the technical field is, mainly, used for the high-speed semiconductor manufacturing process of at least 4 households, such as 64MD lamps, and, mainly, used for the high-speed semiconductor manufacturing process of at least 0.35 U.S.S.S.S. dollars, cMF process is flatly created by cutting off unnecessary stuffed floors by chemical or mechanical methods in order to uniformly form the surface of the red-story structure.
This is a basic material used to build semiconductor integrated circuits, which is primarily derived from the growth of polish Pluish Pad, a set of log-shapeds with a certain pattern of slick and a luton) under the condition that it comes into contact above the surface of the wafers (Polish Ploish Ploishing Ploishing Hed) and goes through the process of mechanical mination of the steel frame on the surface of the wafers. CMF slots are liquid material incorporated between the MFPHD and wafers, which causes chemical reaction between metal layers and wafers, and physical removal from the wafers by using wafers with a detailed metal lus and using a lusized metal lusing metal.
C. The Plaintiff’s patent 1) filed an application for patent invention with respect to CMP sludge, as described in 4) and registered.
(2) On November 11, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for correction as to Article 23, 27, 28, and 29 of the instant patent with the Intellectual Property Tribunal (No. 2014No. 120) on March 30, 2015, but the application was accepted on March 30, 2015, but the Defendant filed the application against the Plaintiff on July 8, 2015 (No. 2015Da38499).