logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.03 2019나85386
추심금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and the appeal shall be 1.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and thus, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal as follows.

A. Section 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance held that “The instant claim for the construction cost” was “The amount to KRW 123,209,830,000, which is equivalent to the premium in arrears, out of the instant claim for the construction cost.”

(b) No. 3 of the first instance judgment No. 2 of the third instance judgment, “A evidence” was written with “A evidence No. 1 through 6”.

(c)

Part 15 to 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance on the third 3rd 1st 1st 1st 16th 1st 1st 1st 22

The construction has not been completed

In addition, “no claim for construction cost exists” is re-issued.

B The construction was not completed.

Even if it is possible to recognize the claim for the construction cost based on the utility model, the claim shall be accepted.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow