1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is in attached Form 2.

1. The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial while filing an appeal by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the defendant in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the purport of whole pleadings in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are examined, the judgment of the court of

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(However, the part on the co-defendant B, which was separated and determined, is excluded). Of the judgment of the first instance, “Defendant B” in the judgment of the first instance is en bloc called “Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial.”

The fourth and sixth parts of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "the same person".

A evidence No. 2 shall be added to the ground for recognition of No. 4 of the first instance judgment. 14.

The 4th page of the first instance judgment shall be added to the following:

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the Plaintiff loaned 24.5% per annum to Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial on July 26, 2017, with interest of 30 million won per annum 24.5% per annum, overdue interest rate of 24% per annum, maturity date of repayment, August 8, 2021. Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial lost the benefit of time due to overdue payment from September 10, 2018. As of November 1, 2018, the remainder of the Plaintiff’s loans to B was equivalent to KRW 17,502,656 and the principal amount of the loans of KRW 16,545,437 as of November 2, 2018, according to the above acknowledged facts, according to the Plaintiff’s loans to the above Plaintiff’s above acknowledged facts, the Plaintiff’s claims for the above loans are one of the claims already accrued prior to the avoidance of the loans.

(d) in turn to (2), (3), and (4);

The term "1/2" in the fourth sentence below shall be read as "1/2 equity".

The 6th part of the first instance judgment "1/3 equity" is raised as "1/6 equity".

2. Conclusion.