logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.12.08 2015나4465
위자료
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 5, Eul's testimony as witness of the first instance trial, Eul's testimony as witness of the trial of the court of first instance (the testimony to the effect that the following testimony is opposed to the facts recognized below is not trusted), and all pleadings, the plaintiff is the husband of E, the defendant and Eul became aware of smartphone hosting app around July 2013 and made contact three times. Eul was born in 1976. The defendant was born in 1976. The defendant was born in 1983. The defendant was a woman with only with the defendant, and there was a child, and Eul was a child in the photo disclosed to the Kakaox of the court of first instance, the defendant and E were removed from the Seocho-gu Seoul Fel on July 30, 2013 to the end of the defendant's vehicle's drinking and drinking.

According to the above facts of recognition, it cannot be concluded that the defendant and E have a sexual intercourse after entering the motel with insufficient evidence that it was sufficient to acknowledge that they had a sexual intercourse, but E has committed an unlawful act that did not have the duty of mutual assistance of the married couple (the "illegal act, which is a judicial divorce ground under Article 840 subparagraph 1 of the Civil Act, should be understood as a wider concept including any unlawful act that is deemed not to be faithful to the duty of mutual assistance of the married couple even if it did not reach the common sense, and this is also the same in case of compensation for damages caused by one of the married couple's unlawful acts). The defendant also committed an unlawful act with E to the plaintiff who is the spouse by infringing on the communal life of the married couple falling under the essence of the marriage or impeding its maintenance, and infringing on the right as the spouse.

arrow