beta
Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, Appellant
Yangsan Market (Korean Law Firm, Attorneys Cho Jong-chul et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 11, 2009
The first instance judgment
Ulsan District Court Decision 2008Guhap2976 Decided June 10, 2009
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's disposition to exclude the plaintiff from the passenger taxi transport business license holder on August 25, 2008 shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's reasoning concerning this case is the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Yoon Jin-tae (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Justice)