logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.12.26 2012고단5917
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Around 16:56 on March 31, 1997, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority, when the Defendant, who was an employee of the Defendant, loaded and operated the freight in excess of the limitation on the vehicle A, at Msan business office, which is a point of 385.2km from the Southern Sea Line 385.2km from the Defendant’s employees.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, and accordingly, the said provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under Article 58(2)

arrow