logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.12.26 2012고단5903
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Around April 29, 1999, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority, on the part of the Defendant’s employees, by loading and operating the freight exceeding the limited storage weight of B freight vehicles at a point 31.2 km away from the 31.2km away from the Gyeong-gu Road and the Busan Coast Guard.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, and accordingly, the said provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under Article 58(2)

arrow