logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.05.14 2015고단265
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 20, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) with a support from the Gwangju District Court, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) with the same support on April 10, 2014.

On October 5, 2014, at around 22:10, the Defendant driven Bho-do car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.171% without a vehicle driver’s license at the section of about 15km from the front of the Dopo-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si to the underground parking lot located in the 15km-gun, Yannam-gun, Samnam-gun-gun, Samnam-do-dong-gun to the 5km apartment complex.

2. On October 5, 2014, the Defendant is driving a car while under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license, such as the description in paragraph (1), at an underground parking lot in a nearby Blue apartment complex as set forth in paragraph (1), around October 22 and 10, 2014.

Other automobiles caused a traffic accident, and the police officer sent to the site after receiving a report, and the police officer voluntarily operated the vehicle as the C District of the Military Police Station in the Banananananan Police Station.

On October 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the C District Office of the Unclaimed Police Station, around 23:06, at the office of the Unclaimed Police Station; (b) there was a concern that the Defendant would be subject to a heavy punishment by driving under the influence of alcohol once again, despite having the Defendant’s ability to drive under the influence of alcohol; (c) had the Defendant’s personal information known as D; and (d) had the Defendant’s resident registration number printed to E in the name column of the Defendant’s personal information; (d) signed the “D” in the report on detection of drinking drivers; (d) voluntary behavior agreement; and (d) delivered it to F and Assistant E, respectively.

As a result, the defendant has forged and exercised one copy of the report on detection of a master driver in the name of D, the voluntary consent form, and the circumstantial statement of a master driver in the name of D, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, and the other person's resident registration number.

arrow