logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.10.17 2013고단3930
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On May 22, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would lend the Fteice rental fee in Daegu-gu E, and pay it in full upon receiving membership fees from other members,” to the victim C, who was engaged in the teice business from the Defendant, a teice instructor, in the vicinity of the cash payment period for the Daegu-gu D Apartment Bank located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu D apartment complex.”

However, the Defendant did not have any ability or intent to repay money even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, because of economic difficulties as at the time of bad credit, such as borrowing of money or receiving membership fees from not only the victim but also other members.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 4 million won from the victim to the financial account in the G name used by the Defendant.

B. On July 3, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would, in the vicinity of the cash payment period of the International Bank of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant would have to pay 1,300,000 won to the victim “I would have borrowed 1,300,000 won to the

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any ability or intent to repay the borrowed money from the victim for the same reason as the above-mentioned Paragraph 1(A).

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 1.3 million won from the victim to the financial account in the G name used by the Defendant.

C. On August 1, 2012, at the same place as the above-mentioned No. 1-B, the Defendant, despite having no capacity or intent to repay the money for the foregoing reason, made a false statement to the effect that “I would necessarily pay the money to the victim if I would have borrowed the money,” and then acquired the money by transfer from the victim to the above financial account.

On September 4, 2012, the Defendant is entitled to the foregoing Section 1.

arrow