Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a low-priced vehicle B.

1. On October 9, 2010, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, even though he was not allowed to operate the said vehicle, the mandatory insurance period of which expires, but operated on July 30, 201 at the intersection of the Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun, Gosung-gun on July 30, 201.

2. On July 30, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”), driving the above vehicle at around 20:24 minutes, and driving on the two-lanes in front of the high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed traffic signal zone in the direction of a bus terminal in the direction of the cross-city bus terminal from the front side of the teachers’ three streets.

Since there is a place where traffic is controlled by the traffic signal apparatus, the driver has the duty of care to confirm whether there is a vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing speed and checking the front side well, and to safely drive according to the progress signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part in front of the driver’s seat of the victim C(35 years old) driving, which was proceeding to cross-section from the left side of the moving direction by negligence in violation of the moving direction red signal, to the right side of the driver’s seat of the victim C(BMW) driving, which was proceeding to cross-section in accordance with the new code.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the scopical scopic scopic scopty which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, on the grounds as stated in the preceding paragraph, at the time and place, destroyed the car owned by the victim C by approximately KRW 9,436,00 for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Mandatory Insurance Association, written diagnosis, written estimate, and mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3 (1), proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;