logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1596
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall transfer any access medium to the use and management of the access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

From B, “the Defendant is to be used for Boscing, and is not to have the passbook sold;

On May 29, 2014, 2000 won per head of the Tong, 40,000 won per 1 head of the Tong, she was transferred to B prior to the new branch of the Korean Investment Securities Daegu-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by transferring the passbook of the Korean Investment Securities Account (Account Number: C) and cash card, OTP card, etc. connected thereto, and notified the password of the passbook, Internet banking ID and password, and issued KRW 80,00,000 in return for the transfer of cash cards, OTP cards, etc. connected thereto to the passbook of the Dongyang Securities Center in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and 2-dong, Daegu-gu, to B, prior to the point of the Daegu branch of the Bank Center, the head of the Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the head of the Dong, 200,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media to another person on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. A written consent to the provision of financial transaction information, etc. and the application of each investigation report (Evidence List 2 through 6)-related statutes;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of Punishment for the Crime (Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, due to the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the fact that the defendant has no same record of sentencing as the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and reflects his depth, the same type of punishment as the order shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, considering the fact that

arrow