logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.27 2016고합637
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(음란물제작ㆍ배포등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized evidence 1 to 3 shall be confiscated.

80 hours per the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 18:00 on March 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) proposed two female juveniles, who were aware of the fact that he/she was parked on the Sejong-si Eup, Sejong-si, to “be allowed to take off the horses and pictures” through the Internet website; (b) had the said juveniles dissipate the Defendant’s sexual organ on his/her back seat; and (c) continuously had the said juveniles go against the Defendant’s sexual organ on his/her hand and by paying 50,000 won to the said juveniles.

The Defendant, from around that time to March 9, 2016, had female juveniles purchase child and juvenile sex through 12 times in total, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

2. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (production and distribution of obscene materials);

A. On March 13, 2014, the Defendant produced child and juvenile pornography in a way that two female juveniles who met through the Internet site, etc., as described in paragraph (1), have taken the image of her sexual organ by photographing the Defendant’s sexual organ with his/her hand and scam, from the vehicle owned by the Defendant on the Sejong-si Eup, Sejong-si, 2014.

From around that time to October 25, 2016, the Defendant produced child and juvenile pornography by photographing female juveniles with dynamic images, such as their fingers and scams, and the appearance of female juveniles harming the Defendant’s sexual organ by entering a total of 15 times, or by storing pictures with which female juveniles exposed their chests and frys while making a mobile phone image call with female juveniles.

B. On December 2015, the Defendant, at the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., in which the Defendant was working, and at the office of the Co., Ltd., the Defendant 2-A.

. have been manufactured as such.

arrow