logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고단7568
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant, as well as B, C, D, and E, entered “F hotel” in Thailand around January 31, 2014, in the “F hotel,” one set of psychotropic drugs purchased by B in the camping market located in Thailand, and made it together with water.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, and E, administered an X-mail.

2. A person who violates the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (marijuth) shall not smoke marijuana, however, be drank by the Defendant in the “F hotel” located in Thailand around January 31, 2014, and in the camping market purchased in Thailand B, which is located in Thai C, D, and E, with the smoke that occurs by adding the fire to the marijuana inhalers, and entered with B, C, D, and E.

Accordingly, the Defendant smoked marijuana in collusion with B, C, D, and E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (calculated additional charges);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2, Article 61 (1) 4 (a), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of smoking in marijuana) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. concerning the crime under the relevant Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the same record as the sentencing of the provisional payment order, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc. should be comprehensively taken into account as well as the fact that the defendant's age, character and environment, etc. are given a single medication at the destination of the trip. It is so decided as per Disposition for the

arrow