Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the traffic laws on roads shall perform an act of sticking on roads under the influence of liquor;

Nevertheless, around 02:56 October 1, 2017, the Defendant performed an act of sticking the center part of the road, under the influence of alcohol, on the front side of the bank located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Myeon-dong 632-3.

2. The Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force, such as walking the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A detailed statement of the results of the process of reporting 112 cases, such as data for the cutting of a black stuff image;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (to peruse CCTVs for crime prevention, 632-3, Myeong-dong);

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 4 of Article 157, Article 68 (3) 1 (the fact that a prohibited act on the road has been committed) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order has the record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact of this case even during the suspended execution period. However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the degree of damage caused by the crime of interference with the business of this case is relatively minor, the injured person does not want to be punished against the defendant by agreement with the victim, and the defendant suffers from the stimulative disorder.