Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:25, 2018, the Defendant: (b) was a victim of the D taxi driven by the victim C (67 years of age) on the 4th station in the Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

“A public bath,” without paying a taxi fee, and after receiving a 112 report from the victim, the police officer repeats boarding and leaving the taxi even after the victim was called out, and the victim “brings and frings the same frings” shall be the victim.

“Absing the victim’s selling part of the victim’s selling part on drinking, etc., which interfered with the victim’s taxi business by force for about 30 minutes, including the victim’s selling part on twice.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act did not pay KRW 11,500 to the victims C on board at the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, and did not pay the same value to the victims C on board the relevant taxi without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (the counter-investigation of a police officer dispatched to the scene);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3 (1) 39 (the point of freeboard) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Article 3 (1) 39 (the point of freeboard) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the choice of fines

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (which was in a mental and physical state at the time when the defendant was in a mental and physical state;

However, the defendant's ability to discern things at the time was weak solely on the fact that the defendant's use of friendly drugs and drinking alcohol is in a state of drinking.

It is difficult to see it]

The reason for sentencing is against the Defendant’s depth when committing the instant crime.

Until now, this case has been treated with depression, and it is being treated with depression.

As a result, the Company.