logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.02.16 2014고단1970
업무상배임
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Victim H Co., Ltd. (the representative I, hereinafter referred to as the victim Co., Ltd.) located in Chungcheongbuk-gun G

m) The company is a company that manufactures prefabricated equipment and DNA phishing process equipment of Lithium 2 tea batteries (hereinafter “second batteries”) (a non-nets, gas, and electric shocks generated in the process of inserting and charging and discharging batteries after the first assembly of the batteries, and removing electric damages in excess of the total quantity, and then assembling them and then measuring voltages, etc. (a facility that classifys the classification of batteries for which voltages, etc. have been completed).

On September 25, 2006, the Defendant joined the victim company as an agent and engaged in design work. On September 25, 2006, the Defendant as the chief of the design team, revised and supplemented the design drawings of DNA equipment, which corresponds to a part of the equipment for the second cell dumping process.

On December 10, 2008, the Defendant made a covenant of confidentiality and restriction on employment of competitors to the victim company on December 10, 2008. On May 27, 2011, the Defendant made a pledge to return all the data related to the development and manufacture at the time of retirement, submitted a written resignation, and retired on June 30, 201.

Therefore, according to the good faith principle, the Defendant has a duty not to divulge to another person the data and information, etc., which are major business assets of the victim company, which could have been accessed at the time of serving in the victim company, even after the withdrawal.

Nevertheless, on June 30, 201, the defendant violated the above duty, and stored computer drawings, such as 100 - - 100 - - 1 - Dop CUTT. D. D.g., which were stored on the computer for business purposes, in the above victim's office, from the "SPG959-DAS" brand, the main business assets of the victim's company, which were stored on the computer for business purposes, by copying the computer drawings, such as computer files, such as 1. small - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Defendant for the same year

9. 15. Business affairs owned by the company, which are entered in the Jinjin Park Park-gu, Inc.

arrow