Defendant

A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of G as an incorporated association, the president of G as an incorporated association, and the defendant C is an important intangible cultural heritage holder of H.

1. Defendant A and the Defendants: (a) around February 2010, at the G Office, an incorporated association located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, requested the Cultural Heritage Administration to provide subsidies, such as aviation charges, to 15 participants in the performance, along with a plan that: (b) around May 1, 2010 to conduct H performance and education in the Chinese ice-si from May 1, 201 to October 10 of the same month; (c)

4. 23. 23. The Cultural Heritage Administration received subsidies of KRW 10,00,000 for H performance in the J of Haice-si, China, from the Cultural Heritage Administration.

However, in fact, even though the above performance was revoked on April 2010, the Defendants did not refund the subsidies of KRW 10,000,000,000 which they received as above and used KRW 2,00,000 to the Chinese ice City on May 21, 2010, and KRW 5,000,000 out of the remainder of KRW 8,000,000 was used for each individual purpose by Defendant A and KRW 3,00,000 for each individual purpose.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the subsidy for purposes other than its original purpose and embezzled it.

2. At least three experts, including those who have extensive knowledge and experience in important intangible cultural heritage, shall participate in the examination to examine skills or artistic talents of a person who has received the education for transfer of important intangible cultural heritage C for at least three years.

On April 25, 2010, the Defendant independently examined the arts of K, L, M, N,O, P, and Q, which had received H education at the above office G office of the said incorporated association, and then prepared a “written assessment of completion of important intangible cultural heritage” in the above name A and B to the effect that “seven persons, such as K, etc., who are employees of the said corporation, are qualified as persons who have completed the important intangible cultural heritage,” and written seven copies of the “written assessment of completion of important intangible cultural heritage” in the above name A and B as intended.

Accordingly, the defendant is to exercise the right in collusion with R.