The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant reported the instant case to the police in front of the first floor convenience store of the D Public Notice Center building located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan on September 12, 2015, on September 12, 2015; (b) the Defendant was able to obtain the phone call from the victim E on the ground that he reported the instant case to the police; and (c) the Defendant was able to obtain the phone call from the victim E on the part of his hand, which is a dangerous object in the said D Public Notice Center’s general office.

I would like to die in the same year. "The victim's intimidation".

2. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion, although at the time of the instant case, the Defendant stated the following actions in the following circumstances, the Defendant did not engage in any threatening speech and behavior as stated in the facts charged, and is disputing the facts charged in the instant case.

① Prior to the occurrence of the instant case, the victim E and F performed a scambling act, such as scambling, while drinking alcohol in front of the first floor convenience store. A person who scambling at the said D Public Notice Board 507, resisting the act of disturbance, and scambling with the victim.

F assaulted the person residing in F.D. 507.

② The Defendant told the F’s assault act and reported it to the police.

After the investigation, the police, who was called the victim, tried to return to the investigation, made several calls with the defendant's complaint against the act of reporting, and made the defendant's abusive language or "absoning down the times".

③ Even after that, the victim saw a large voice before the convenience store, the Defendant opened a window in the office of the Institute of Public Notice and asked the victim to see himself/herself, but the victim continued to see his/her obsesses while continuing to do so.

④ Accordingly, the Defendant set excessive rates to the table table before the convenience point in which the victim was a victim, and told the victim to the effect that the victim “hing down only hinging off,” and did not engage in an act threatening to the victim. In other words, the Defendant did not act as a threat to the victim.