logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고정2299
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) in collusion with the said D to set off the credit in the commercial building on the grounds that the victim C, who sells the 1st floor of the said commercial building, does not cooperate with D; (c) in order to set off the credit in the commercial building; (d) in collusion with the said D; and (e) the victim C, a propuper of the commercial building leased by the victim C, even though the victim C did not have any unpaid amount of the management fee for the commercial building for three months; (c) even though the victim C did not have any unpaid amount of the management fee for the commercial building, the FF Co. 11 of the leased merchant of the platform, provided all benefits from G to the former president; (d) intentionally disturbs the order of the neighboring merchants; and (e) intentionally

The management expenses for the operation of commercial buildings shall be unpaid from October 2012 to the present (three months) and may cause enormous impediment to the operation of commercial buildings.

(b) Some of these merchants are carrying alcoholic beverages in the central passage of commercial buildings after the closure point, and they are fluoring them without breast.

Since 80% merchants feel fear and have a great impediment to their livelihood as well as mental damage, they will audit when reviewing re-contracts for the development of commercial buildings for rental merchants who interfere with the operation of commercial buildings.

(b) Dispatching items containing false information;

Victim C's credit was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and H;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A certificate of fact prepared by H;

1. Open text sent;

1. Investigation report (Submission of a receipt for the payment of management expenses by the complainant);

1. A receipt for the payment of management expenses ( September, October, November, and December, 2012);

1. Court rulings 2013 High Court Decision 3582 Credit Damages (Defendant D);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the witness examination protocol;

1. Article 313 of the Criminal Act and Articles 313 and 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow